Showing 339 results

Names
P0239 · Person · 1855 - 1931

Sir David Bruce was a pathologist and microbiologist born in Melbourne, Australia on 29 May 1855. He was the son of Scottish parents, who emigrated to Australia during the gold rush. At the time of his birth, Bruce's father was installing a crushing machine at Sandhurst in the Australian gold fields. Bruce's parents, David Bruce and Jane Russell Hamilton were from Airth and Stirling, respectively. The family returned to Scotland when Bruce was five and settled in Stirling, where Bruce attended Stirling High School before beginning an apprenticeship in Manchester in 1869. This was soon brought to an end when Bruce contracted pneumonia, after which he began studying zoology at the university of Edinburgh in 1876; he later changed to medicine and graduated in 1881. Bruce was a keen naturalist and went into general practice in Reigate where he met and married his wife, who acted as his technical assistant and proved an accomplished artist who illustrated the records of his discoveries.

In 1883, Bruce became an officer in the royal army medical corps. While serving in Malta, many British soldiers suffered an outbreak of what was called the Malta fever. Bruce identified the bacterium causing the illness as Micrococcus melitensis, which was later renames as Brucella melitensis in his honour. He also chaired the Mediterranean fever commission from 1904 - 1906 and the commission succeeded in tracing the source of the infection to the unpasturised milk of the Maltese goat. However, it later came to light that much of the research into the source of the bacterium was carried out by Themistocles Zammit (1864 - 1935), a Maltese scientist and archaeologist, whom Bruce attempted to discredit and defame. Bruce succeeded in taking credit for Zammit's work for many years before Zammit was eventually recognised and rewarded with a knighthood for his work.

Bruce was later posted to South Africa where he discovered that the tsetse fly was the carrier of the parasite responsible for trypanosomiasis, also known as nagana or the nagana pest in animals and sleeping sickness in humans. Despite his work being disrupted by the second Boer war, Bruce was rewarded with a knighthood in 1908 for his research. Following this discovery, he worked on infectious diseases in several countries and was commandant of the royal army medical college during the First World War. Bruce became the commander of the royal army medical college in 1914, a position he held until his retirement as a Major-General in 1919. He was then appointed as the chairman of the governing body of the Lister Institute.

David Bruce died four days after his wife, on 27 November 1931, on the day of her funeral. The pair were both cremated in London and buried together in Valley Cemetery in Stirling, close to Stirling Castle. The couple did not have any children.

P0090 · Person · 1795 – 1864

Bruce’s ancestors had owned the Kennet estate since the mid-sixteenth century. His great-grandfather, Alexander Bruce, married in 1714 Mary Balfour, younger sister of Robert, 5th Lord Balfour of Burleigh, a convicted murderer who had escaped from custody in 1709 by disguising himself in his sister’s clothes. Balfour came out for the Pretender in the ’15, was attainted and died without issue in 1757. Mary Bruce died the following year and her sister Margaret died unmarried in 1769 when, but for the attainder, Alexander Bruce’s son Robert (Lord Kennet SCJ) would have succeeded her as Lord Balfour of Burleigh. His only surviving son Alexander was sometime a merchant in China before he inherited Kennet in 1785. On his death in 1808 his son Robert, the subject of this biography, became laird of Kennet at the age of 12. Bruce’s grandfather, Lord Kennet, had married a sister of the military hero, Sir Ralph Abercromby† (1734-1801) of Tullibody, whose widow was created Baroness Abercromby. Her son, George Abercromby, who succeeded her in the peerage in 1821, may have had some responsibility for Bruce, his second cousin, during his minority. Bruce’s brief military career included service at Waterloo, where he was wounded. At the general election of 1820 he was returned unopposed for Clackmannanshire on Abercromby’s interest, as a locum for Abercomby’s only son, a minor.

He gave general support to Lord Liverpool’s administration, but occasionally took an independent line. He voted against economies in revenue collection, 4 July 1820, and in defence of ministers’ conduct towards Queen Caroline, 6 Feb. 1821. He was one of the Scottish county Members who divided for repeal of the additional malt duty, 21 Mar., and he stood his ground when government exerted themselves to defeat the repeal bill, 3 Apr. 1821. He voted against the disfranchisement of ordnance officials, 12 Apr., and parliamentary reform, 9, 10 May 1821. He divided against the opposition’s call for more extensive tax reductions, 21 Feb., but voted for admiralty economies, 1 Mar., and a cut in the army estimates, 20 Mar. 1822. He voted against abolition of one of the joint-postmasterships, 13 Mar., and inquiry into the lord advocate’s dealings with the Scottish press, 25 June 1822. He sided with government against repeal of the assessed taxes, 10, 18 Mar., and of the Foreign Enlistment Act, 16 Apr., and against Scottish parliamentary reform, 2 June, and inquiry into the currency, 12 June 1823. He voted against the production of information on the Dublin Orange theatre riot, 24 Mar., but was one of the anti-Catholics (he had voted against relief, 28 Feb. 1821, 30 Apr. 1822) who divided with opposition to secure an investigation of the prosecution of the miscreants, 22 Apr. 1823. He voted against reform of Edinburgh’s representation, 26 Feb. 1824. He presented constituency petitions against the duty on notaries’ licences, 5 Apr., for the abolition of slavery, 11 May, and against the beer bill, 13 May 1824.

In 1823 Bruce sought an interview with Lord Liverpool to press his claim to the forfeited Balfour peerage in view of government’s plans to restore the lineal descendants of attainted peers to their ancestors’ honours. He had petitioned the king on this during his visit to Scotland in August 1822:

Mine is a case of peculiar aggravated hardship ... Both Lord Melville and the lord advocate are of opinion that it is a singular case ... and that it will by no means interfere with the claim of any other collateral branch.

He got no satisfaction, and when government introduced bills to reverse the attainders of five peers, 14 June 1824, he complained in the House of the preference given to lineal over collateral descendants:

He yielded to no man in loyalty to the House of Hanover, and most painfully did he feel the distinction by which he suffered on the present occasion. Though the blood from which he was collaterally descended from ... [Lord Balfour] was pure and untainted, yet still was he, and those who were to succeed him, excluded from the royal grace.
Many of his audience evidently sympathized with him, but the home secretary Peel stated that as an indiscriminate reversal of all attainders was impracticable, ministers had felt obliged to select only those which were free from uncertainty over the legitimacy of the original patent. Soon afterwards Bruce sold his army commission and vacated his seat for Abercromby’s son.

In 1832 and 1835 he unsuccessfully contested the reformed constituency of Clackmannan and Kinross as a Conservative. He was thought to have a ‘good chance’ of success in 1837, but did not stand. In 1841, as a member of the committee of the general assembly of the Church of Scotland, he wrote to Peel of his alarm at the growing schism within the church and pledged his support for any ‘healing measure’ which recognized the principle of non-intrusion. The following year, when vainly seeking to have his brother Hugh made sheriff of Renfrewshire, he told Peel that he was only deterred from challenging the Liberal candidate for Clackmannan and Kinross at the impending by-election ‘by the conviction, that any Conservative could not succeed, from the nature of the constituency, and number of towns and villages opposed to the agricultural interest’.

In 1860 Bruce, having accidentally discovered the patent of the Balfour peerage in a chest at Kennet, petitioned Queen Victoria on his claim to the titles of Lord Balfour of Burleigh and Lord Kilwinning. The petition was referred to the Lords’ committee of privileges in 1861, when his claim to the Balfour peerage was disputed by Francis Walter Balfour of Fernie, a descendant of a younger son of the 3rd Lord Balfour. Nothing had been decided by the time of Bruce’s death in August 1864. The following year his only son, Alexander Hugh Bruce, a minor (Bruce had been 54 when he was born) renewed the claim. His right to the Balfour peerage was allowed, 23 July 1868, but he was ruled not to have made out his case regarding the Kilwinning title, which had been challenged by Lord Eglinton in 1863. He was created Lord Balfour of Burleigh by private Act, 19 Mar. 1869

P0159 · Person · d. 1880

Jane Anna Maria Mac Gregor was the daughter of Maj.-Gen. Sir Evan John Murray Mac Gregor of Mac Gregor, 2nd Bt. and Lady Elizabeth Murray. She married, firstly, John James Hamilton Burgoyne, son of Sir John James Burgoyne, Bt. and Charlotte Head. She married, secondly, unknown le Maout. She died on 19 July 1880.

Her married name became le Maout. Her married name became Burgoyne.

P0158 · Person · d. 1856

John James Hamilton Burgoyne was born circa 1808. He was the son of Sir John James Burgoyne, Bt. and Charlotte Head.

He married Jane Anna Maria Mac Gregor, daughter of Maj.-Gen. Sir Evan John Murray Mac Gregor of Mac Gregor, 2nd Bt. and Lady Elizabeth Murray. He died circa 30 June 1856 at Weymouth, Dorset, England. He was buried on 3 July 1856 at Melcombe Regis, Dorset, England.

He gained the rank of Captain in the 93rd Highlanders.